There is a certain kind of argument that improves with age, provided you have the patience to keep making it. European broadcasters have been telling regulators for close to two decades that they need permission to merge or they will simply disappear. On July 6, Sky and ITV finally got the chance to test whether, this time, anyone believes them.
Comcast-owned Sky confirmed Monday that it has agreed to pay £1.6 billion, or about $2.1 billion, to acquire ITV's broadcasting and streaming operations. The transaction would join Britain's largest pay-television operator with its largest commercial free-to-air broadcaster — a combination that would have been unthinkable a generation ago, when regulators viewed such pairings as threats to competition rather than responses to it.
Dana Strong, the chief executive of Sky, called the deal "a defining moment for British media." Carolyn McCall, her counterpart at ITV, described the resulting entity as "a UK champion with the scale and resources to better compete with global streaming platforms." (What, you were expecting them to say it was a modest regional entrant?)
The transaction excludes ITV Studios, the production arm responsible for "Coronation Street" and "Love Island," which will be spun off as a standalone, London-listed content business. Sky has committed to at least £2.1 billion in programming spending with ITV Studios between 2028 and 2032, a figure that suggests the two companies will remain closely entwined even after the separation.
The deal arrives amid a broader wave of consolidation across European broadcasting. Legacy players, squeezed by Netflix and Amazon on the audience side and by YouTube, Facebook and TikTok on the advertising side, have been coming to the same conclusion with increasing urgency. In Germany, RTL recently secured approval to acquire Comcast's Sky Deutschland business. The Berlusconi family's MediaForEurope group has taken control of ProSiebenSat.1, Germany's second-largest commercial broadcaster, adding to a pan-European conglomerate that already includes network assets in Spain and Italy.
"Broadcasters can no longer afford to think only in national silos while Netflix, YouTube, Amazon and Disney operate with global technology, global data and global balance sheets," said Paolo Pescatore, an analyst at PP Foresight.
Regulators who blocked earlier attempts at scale now appear to have accepted these mergers as inescapable. In 2009, the Competition Commission killed Project Kangaroo, a joint video-on-demand venture proposed by ITV, the BBC and Channel 4, on the grounds that the broadcasters' dominant share of British-originated content would restrict competition. Three years later, Netflix arrived in Britain and immediately took off. Last year, YouTube passed ITV to become the second-most-watched media service in the country, behind only the BBC.
The question now is whether the new math will satisfy regulators. A merged Sky-ITV would control around 70 percent of the British television advertising market by traditional measures. But Ms. McCall has argued that on a broader video-advertising basis, "Sky and ITV combined would be about 20 percent of advertising." Depending on how you measure it, the combined market share of the two broadcasters is below that of YouTube alone.
Not everyone is persuaded. Channel 4 and Channel 5, both reliant on advertising revenue and lacking Sky's pay-television cushion, are expected to raise competition concerns. And there are structural questions involving ITV's 40 percent stake in ITN, which supplies news to Channel 4 and Channel 5 as well as ITV itself.
Brian Wieser, the principal at Madison and Wall, noted that a merged Sky-ITV would represent "a larger share of a challenged TV market" — roughly £2.3 billion in advertising revenue, or about 44 percent of total television ad spending in Britain. But he warned that the deal "does not change the broader structural pressure facing television." He estimated that combined British advertising revenue for Sky and ITV fell by 7 percent year over year in 2025, even as the overall advertising market grew by 10 percent.
Twenty years ago, European broadcasters desperate to scale got turned down by regulators not yet convinced that this newfangled internet was all that. This time, even the watchdogs have realized the world has changed. Whether the realization has come in time to matter is a question the deal itself cannot answer.
Original story published in The Hollywood Reporter: "The Get-Big-or-Die Era of European TV Has Arrived"